Public Comment Number PC-UK0276 ISO/IEC CD2 9899 (SC22N2794) Public Comment =========================================== Date: 1998-12-11 Author: Derek M.Jones Author Affiliation: Knowledge Software Ltd Postal Address: Knowledge Software Ltd 62 Fernhill Road Farnborough Hants GU14 9RZ United Kingdom E-mail Address: Telephone Number: +44 1252 520667 Category: Editorial Committee Draft subsection: various Title: Assorted editorial changes Detailed description: Each of these changes stands alone. [A] Clause 3.11: Change to "unspecified behaviour where each implementation shall document the behaviour for that implementation." [B] Clause 3.13: documents -> shall document [C] Clause 6.3.2.2: When is an expression "evaluated as a void expression". The original (6.2.2.2) wording is much clearer and should continue to be used. [D] Clause 6.4.3, para 2: Change "... required character set." to "... required source character set."? But they may also apply to the execution character set. Which required character set is being required? [We believe that the term "required" is being replaced.] [E] Clause 6.1.1.2, para 5. Remove. The standard is not in the business of specifing quality of implementation diagnostics. [F] Clause 6.5, para 4: Change "... are required to have ..." back to "... shall have ...". [G] Clause 6.5.2.2, para 4: Change "An argument may be ..." to "An argument shall be ...". [H] Footnote 85: Delete. It appears to be a glorified forward reference. [I] Clause 6.8.4.2, para 3: Change "... expression and no two ..." back to "... expression. No two ...".